by Yve Van der Donck, Director & Creative Director OADC
on 3/9/2026

Complex science deserves a strong visual language

5 min read

Life sciences is a sector built around complex processes that often take years of development before they reach a patient, a physician, a laboratory or the market.

The communication around them is often just as rational.

 

And that’s understandable. When you need to explain a complex technology, therapy or solution, clarity comes first. So, we see experts in front of the camera, laboratories, equipment, graphs and animations. Everything accurate, clear and scientifically sound.

Perfect… right?

But along the way, there are powerful stories to tell.

 

Behind every innovation are people.

 

Researchers who spend years searching for an answer. Entrepreneurs who believe in an idea whose impact has yet to be proven. Physicians hoping that a new technology can make a difference. Patients for whom that technology may ultimately have real meaning.

These are stories that go beyond the technical workings of a product.

 

A laboratory is often used in corporate films as visual confirmation: “Look, this is a science company.”

But a laboratory can be much more than that.

It can become a world where precision, concentration and curiosity become visible. The light, the reflections, the movements of a researcher, an action repeated: all these elements can help create a feeling.

 

We don’t need to make science simpler than it is. And we don’t need to make it more spectacular than it is.

But we can make it more interesting to look at, with greater depth.

 

One of the most powerful ways to communicate a complex subject is through a double narrative.

On one level, we tell the factual story: what does the company do, what technology are they developing, what problem are they solving?

 

But alongside that, a second story can unfold. A visual or emotional layer, for example through a metaphor that doesn’t literally explain what is happening but strengthens and deepens the story.

 

A search, for instance, could be visualized as finding a way through unfamiliar territory. A breakthrough could be connected to crossing a boundary or finding light in the darkness.

Not as a gimmick, but as a way of engaging the viewer’s imagination.

 

Because when you only show what is literally happening, the viewer often remains in the rational layer of the story. A metaphor creates space for interpretation.

 

And that is precisely where film can do something a presentation or technical explanation often cannot: make an idea felt.

Not just informing but moving people to act.

 

A good life-sciences film can therefore be much more than an explanation of a technology.

 

It can create curiosity. Build trust. Make a scientist proud of what they have developed. Get an investor excited about an idea. Convince a potential partner to start a conversation.

Or simply make someone think: “I want to know more about this.”

 

That is the difference between communication that merely informs and communication that moves people to act.

 

When I say that life-sciences communication can also be artistic, I don’t mean that every corporate film needs to be a Cannes contender.

Artistic choices should always serve the story.

 

But within those boundaries, there is enormous potential in light, composition, sound, rhythm…

And, of course, metaphor and imagination.

For me, that is the essence of visual communication: not only showing what is happening, but also why it matters.

 

We live in a world where people see thousands of images every day. A life-sciences company is not only competing online with other biotech companies, but with everything else competing for our attention.

That’s why a correct message is not always enough.

The question increasingly becomes: why should someone keep watching?

And then: what should they feel, understand or remember?

 

A film can invite people into a conversation, a collaboration, an investment or a visit to a website. It can simply invite them to keep watching and discover more.

The more complex the content, the more important its visual translation becomes and the more important it is that the story stays with the viewer.

Perhaps that is ultimately my greatest conviction.

And that is precisely where life sciences and film can meet: at the point where complex science is not only explained, but also made visible, memorable and capable of moving people to take the next step.

—
Connect with Yve:  https://www.linkedin.com/in/yve-van-der-donck-6576016/ 

Visit https://oadc.be/